Oh, don't you worry about them! They will find something. I'm sure about that... let's play guess what will happen!Oh my!
The moaners and grunts won't have a topic to moan and grunt any more. What a ...
People in the DPReview comments are complaining it's APS-C only and took too long. Who would've guessed they would still complain?
Not gonna lie, I would like the Sigma 14/1.4 and 15/1.4 Fisheye on my R5 (or the Canon equivalent, I don't really care who makes it).People in the DPReview comments are complaining it's APS-C only and took too long. Who would've guessed they would still complain?
These two caught my attention. Sounds like real close licence agreement.
That's right, all those people hoping for something higher quality than the 1.8 but not much more expensive will have to keep complaining if it's above $1,000. I'm relieved i was starting to think I was experiencing a delusion!But the 50/1.4 is an L and not an non-L lens. Target missed again
I'd really like some of their full frame lenses released too (particularly the I series primes). Just found it funny people demanded 3rd party lenses, Canon delivered, and they just moved the goalposts and kept complaining.
They will find one.Oh my!
The moaners and grunts won't have a topic to moan and grunt any more. What a ...
It would be even better if they started by making M4/3 lenses for Canon. "There is no Canon M4/3," you say? That's the point!People in the DPReview comments are complaining it's APS-C only and took too long. Who would've guessed they would still complain?
