You also can say - terrible looking lens (question of taste!) and still to be in the very reasonable comments! So far, as I understand we can comment about the look of the lens much more confidently than "commenting" it's performance (if any one has an analysis of the performance - please post it)! I personally have no interest of this lens: not what I need!Beautiful looking lens.
Yes - I'm a Nikon shooter (as many folks know it in this Forum!). I have very good copy of the 200-500 Nikon zoom (but using mostly the 500 PF) but it's not even close to the abilities (huh, especially the weight and the MFD +more!!!) of the RF 100-500! It's what I personally need from Nikon (not because Nikon cares what I need ).
Anyway - lets talk with some facts, it may help the next generations of that particular lens (any company, no matter Canon or Nikon or even Sony) to get better!
Upvote
0