Thanks. "WARNING: Do not use this product if you have a pacemaker or other medical device. The magnet or magnets in this product could cause medical devices to malfunction."
Yes I remember those 5 gauss lines on NMR.
Last time I was at Harvard Med School’s 11.7 T vertical bore magnet, the warning line was a yellow plastic chain laid on the floor that anyone stepping over could easily trip on and kick out of place. EH&S apparently has little clout in academia.
I´m not satisfied with my RF 24-105mm F4 L as well. I sent it to Canon CPS twice already. One time they actually had to adjust the lens group and it helped with focusing issues. The second time they just did some cleaning and stated everything is in order. Of all the L lenses I shot with is probably is the weakest performing one. I don´t do test charts etc, it is just what subjectively feel about the IQ etc.
I really hope it is Value Chain Management to sort out the product delays
There is always the 24-105/2.8 at a bit over double the price
I'm very happy with mine, I use it all the time for my pro work without any issues whatsoever. I also frequently run it on a gimbal, since it offers so much flexibility and IS helps with smoothness of the footage. It's a no brainer lens, both range wise, price wise and feature wise.
I hope this doesn't mean it will rely too much on software distortion correction.
would it be an issue? ultimately it is about the quality of the final file for me.
I found the corrected (DxO) RF 14-35/4 at the wide end to deliver similar extreme corner image quality as the EF 11-24/4, and match the framing of ~13.5mm. Worth noting that at that point in the zoom range, the much more expensive 11-24/4 has essentially no geometric distortion (it’s transitioning from barrel to pincushion). IOW, the force-corrected corners of the RF 14-35 are really quite good.
I thought the same. I want a fantastic IQ 35mm that focuses well. Size and price are secondary (within limits).
I believe Canon will only make one, if this 35 1.4 is coming out, then I guess no hope for a 1.2 lens. But I do wonder if they would make this new 35mm as stellar as the 135mmRF, the ultimate benchmark lens, too sharp and too well-corrected, then the new 35mm would be my ultimate lens for landscape astro panorama with a tracker.
