yeah, i just checked it, the EF 35mm f1.4 II costs 2000$ currently, so it is even cheaper. Good sign!Very good price!
The EL-5 is at B&H for $199 right now (unlisted price).That's not too bad for a recent Canon flash, I wonder how it compares to the EL-5, which can be had for about €100 more nowadays.
The 24-105 f/2.8 was the first.Is this the first even Canon lens with an aperture ring?
That´d be a surprise. But I hope Canon surprises us with a 20mm F1.4 LSo there are two cinema cameras registered... i am kind of pretty sure we will get two cinema cameras. Because, how many cinema camera announcements are there in a year?
There shouldn't be any compromises made at this price. This is the most expensive mirrorless FF 35mm prime this side of Leicas, along with the Sigma 35mm f/1.2 Art at the same price ($1499).I was expecting the usual Canon L tax on the price tag. What kind of compromises have been made?![]()
Best to let Trevor Dobson know then… most of his are at 35mm and some using 50mm.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/trevor_dobson_inefekt69
John Rutter did one using 85mm but will never attempt it again!
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LJ28XKBvBRU
me, I like 20mm![]()
I wonder if the images to each retailer are watermarked so Canon can work out where the leaks are coming from...Retailers send them to me and I don't post them... then they send them out anyway. Good times.
Whatever their process, they seem to be good at itI am good with anything 14 to 24 mm and fast. Looks like many of Trevor’s shots are stacks and composites so 35 would work fine. Requires a lot of tracking or post shoot Photoshop. I tend to shoot single shot MW or do a bit of stacking if I want really sharp skies or have an element in the foreground that I need to focus stack to have in focus. To each their own.